Friday Finance: 401(k)s, superannuation and other retirement programs

https://nestegginvestments.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/FreeGreatPicture.com-29212-golden-nest-egg.jpg

This is an extract from The Poor Man’s Guide to Financial Freedom: A Realistic, 10-Step Manual to Building Liberating Wealth on a Small to Medium Budget.

Retirement Schemes

Developed countries generally have a retirement scheme, or multiple schemes, in order to provide incentives for individual retirement saving and to reduce the burden upon the state pension system.

These vary widely by country, and include the 401(k) and IRA, both Roth and traditional versions (in the US),[i] personal pensions (the UK),[ii] the RRSP (Canada),[iii] or superannuation (Australia[iv] and New Zealand[v]).

Normally, the big carrot dangled in front of your nose is that putting money away for retirement via these schemes can save you a lot on tax.  Sometimes the income going into these schemes is not counted as part of your income, and therefore goes untaxed.  In some situations the withdrawals are also untaxed or attract low taxes. 

Some schemes offer a government or employer co-contribution, which means they may match your payments into the system, in whole or part.  And finally, Australia had the brilliant idea of making these payments compulsory, which I guess is even more effective than a tax incentive.

We shall not describe in detail all the retirement programs for each Anglophone country as that would be a book in itself – indeed, it would be a very large book.  In fact, you could write a whole book about each nation’s retirement system.  I encourage you to research your own scheme thoroughly online, then get advice.

In general, there are pros and cons to each of these programs.  The pros having already been stated, let us look at some of the cons:

– You generally cannot access your money until you reach a certain age, or at least not without suffering a financial penalty.  This is NOT the vehicle for money that you may need before reaching normal retirement age.

– The government sometimes moves the goalposts by changing the rules on you, perhaps by altering tax laws or the age at which you can begin to withdraw funds.  I am not aware of any egregious changes to personal pensions.  In fact, some reforms have improved the situation for retirees.  Nevertheless, be aware that the situation may change.

– Generally, pensions are kept separate from the company’s other finances.  In addition, employees are among the first in line to receive what is owed to them if a company goes bankrupt.[vi]  Some pensions are also insured.  However, check that these safeguards are present in your own jurisdiction, and keep all paperwork related to your pension scheme.

– One of the biggest and most irritating disadvantages these retirement plans can suffer is that they limit your ability to determine where your money goes.  You previously would not have worried much about it, but now that you know why low-fee index funds are so much better than high-fee managed funds, you’ll be pretty annoyed if you find out that your scheme is primarily invested in the latter.  Look around and see what your options are.  Most readers will have at least some choice if they are proactive.

A huge problem with all these schemes is that most investors, having been plonked in them automatically, are far too passive.  They pay no attention to their pension fund until they are a few years away from retirement and so are put in a ‘default’ option which might be unsuitable.  In other cases they take no notice of their fund until they hear there’s a stock market crash in the news and then panic-sell everything, thereby realizing a significant loss.

Don’t be passive.  Be active!  Research your current pension fund online, if you have one.  See how your money is invested and how high the fees are.  Investigate your current investment settings and whether you can change them.  And as always, get advice before making any decisions.

I would also suggest keeping at least some of your long-term investments outside of these programs for the extra flexibility and diversity even if you have to cop a higher tax rate to do so.


[i] https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/retirement/spender-or-saver

[ii] https://www.gov.uk/personal-pensions-your-rights

[iii] https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/tax/individuals/topics/rrsps-related-plans/registered-retirement-savings-plan-rrsp.html

[iv] https://www.ato.gov.au/Individuals/Super/

[v] https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/eligibility/seniors/superannuation/index.html

[vi] http://www.401khelpcenter.com/401k_education/bankruptcy_and_401k.html

Also available on many other platforms.

One comment

  1. Frank K · 6 Days Ago

    In the US, there is another component other than 401K/IRA savings plans: Social Security.

    In the US you are required to contribute 6.4% of your wages (with a wage cap of about $140,000) to Social Security, your employer matches that contribution (if you are self employed you have to pay the match). You get a defined monthly benefit starting at age 62. If you defer collecting the benefit the monthly payout increases until you are 70. IIRC, the current maximum monthly benefit is about $4000.

    At this point social security does not collect enough to pay its benefits, so it is tapping into a “trust fund” it accumulated during the surplus years. The trust fund, which is said to be worth about $2,910,000,000,000 is expected to be exhausted by the mid 2030’s. Whether benefits will be cut or if the government (via even more deficit spending) will cover the shortage is unclear.

    Further complicating things, most government employees in the US have a government pension. In many states they are exempt from paying into Social Security (and thus won’t get any when they retire) and instead pay into their state or municipal pension plan, which in most cases allows them to retire younger and with higher benefits than Social Security. The problem with these pensions is that many are even more underfunded than Social Security. Colorado’s program (PERA) is only about 50% funded and is for all practical purposes insolvent unless it reduces benefits by 50%, which is has not. Most other states are in similar, if not quite so dire circumstances.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s