Religions fit for purpose

The early Romans needed to upgrade their religion.  They had gods, but little imagination or philosophy.  They were a powerful, hollow empire, with no compelling stories to keep the collective heart beating.  Thus, they incorporated and Latinized the religion of the Greeks.

Also drawing from the Greeks was Russian Czar Vladimir, who recognized that his nation needed a modern, international religion in order to civilize and build connections across Europe.  The Orthodox faith easily won over Islam, which prohibited drinking.

The old Norse beliefs were essential for the people of those cold, overpopulated regions.  They needed to expand, and a warlike philosophy to encourage their violence.  They could only dine with the gods by being slain in battle, and the end of the world and domination of evil giants was coming anyway, so out they went and did what they needed to do.

In time, the Vikings has expanded as far as they could, assimilated, and needed a new religion to help build a modern civilization.  Hence, Christianity took over.

In India, Hinduism served the purpose of separating the Northern settlers from the indigenous population through the caste system.  In East Asia, Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism and other faiths helped to generate the social order necessary for widespread rice cultivation, trade, and development.  In prehistoric Australia, local beliefs and song lines helped to preserve traditional knowledge essential for survival in an illiterate culture.

Today, Christianity has become less popular in the West due to increased technology and development.  We no longer need spiritual succor to cope with the loss of a third of our offspring.  We can reproduce in non-traditional ways without immediately causing social collapse, such is the surplus wealth available.

Yet Christian values remain with us.  Once helping to tame wild, Germanic and Celtic passions, these values now lay us open and vulnerable to outside cultures that do not share our gentle and universal beliefs.  We need to recognize that some Western principles have outlived their usefulness, and need to be reformed.

But we cannot revert to the brutish, pagan gods of our ancestors.  Once thoroughly abandoned, a religion can never be revived.  Once we have stopped worshiping a god and fail to be struck down, we can no longer truly believe in that god.  Those who claim to be neopagans are larping.  In any case where a religion was reborn, such as the French return to Catholicism after the Revolution, the faith never really went away.

Today, both the Eastern and Western civilizations are floundering, and our problem is spiritual.  We can’t think of good reasons to marry and raise children anymore.  Whatever beliefs we have left are not fit for purpose.

If we are to revive Christianity, this time we must set aside the most hippie parts of the Gospels to ensure our framework is muscular enough to survive.  In the West, we are no longer barbarians who need to be tamed – we are over-civilized Eloi and we need a rocket up our collective arse to get society back into rude good health.

Either we must resurrect our recently discarded Christianity, if we find it still has a pulse, or we must invent new beliefs – and convince people to believe in them.  Otherwise, we shall perish.

*               *               *               *               *

I’m flogging a book:

The Poor Man’s Guide to Financial Freedom: A Realistic, 10-Step Manual to Building Liberating Wealth on a Low to Medium Income

Also available on many other platforms.



  1. dickycone · July 8, 2020

    I’m not Orthodox, but I saw an Orthodox commenter on a right-wing forum say once that the big mistake other Christians make is thinking that Jesus was a nice guy. Orthodox Jesus, he said, knows what you’ve done and is disgusted by it, and you’d better repent right away or else.


    • Wolf · July 17, 2020

      Orthodox seems less cucked. I’ve been considering raising my kids in it. But birthrates in Orthodox countries are just as bad.


  2. luisman · July 9, 2020

    Reblogged this on Nicht-Linke Blogs.


  3. luisman · July 9, 2020

    What kind of religion survives is determined by the demography. Ed Dutton recently commented on that. He says that the “far right”, meaning real conservatives and very religious people have many children, and the “far left” with their own quasi-religious beliefs have also many, but not quite as many children, and both are K-strategists. Those in the middle have no kids or are r-Strategists, who don’t care much about their kids, a majority of which are ‘spiteful mutants’ and drift to the left, which wants to destroy what they can’t get for themselves.

    Regarding a revival of Christianity, I think it’s unlikely. First for demographic reasons – it dies out with under replacement level birthrates everywhere in the ‘West’. And we had over 1.000 years of religious struggles in Europe about the true Christianity, which ended in a more or less amicable split, followed by an enlightenment which split it even more. The current pope seeks more commonality with the Muslims than trying to reunite the Catholics, Protestants and Orthodox. I’d say everything goes in the wrong direction, for a revival of one single religion based on Christianity. Who knows how long the future ‘dark ages’ will last, but in the end there will be a new religion.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. L. Beau Macaroni · July 12, 2020

    Those who claim to be neopagans are larping. Truer words were never written.

    Off topic: I see that your wonderful list of international musings, “Advice for Every Nation” is now password protected. You must have gotten a few really negative reactions on that one!

    And how do I, an aspiring comrade, get a password for The People’s Blog?


  5. Gunner Q · July 13, 2020

    I think you have it backwards. Society changed dramatically because it changed its religion; religion didn’t become obsolete because society changed. Our beliefs shape our behavior, they are not incidental.

    “But we cannot revert to the brutish, pagan gods of our ancestors. Once thoroughly abandoned, a religion can never be revived. Once we have stopped worshiping a god and fail to be struck down, we can no longer truly believe in that god. Those who claim to be neopagans are larping.”

    Specific deities, yes, but the human compulsion towards worship won’t be denied. I assure you as a Californian, the druids are still with us.


  6. Pingback: Village Atheism – oogenhand
  7. philebersole · January 12

    The problem is that believing in a religion means you think it is true, not that you think that it is good for holding society together. If you advocate for religion on the grounds solely that it is useful, you in fact have no religion, and nobody will take you seriously.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s